https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707795



--- Comment #2 from Artem <[email protected]> ---
Thank you for review. Fixed:

Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/nutty.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/nutty-1.1.1-2.fc30.src.rpm

> - Note: explicit /usr/bin/python3 is specific to Fedora-packaged software;
>   upstream may not want to do that.

OK, now i finally understand because i asked many times about that should i
send PR in such cases or not.

> - License should be "GPLv3+ and ASL 2.0" (also comment that speedtest-cli is
>   ASL2.0)

Fixed.

> - The size@2 directories are not part of the hicolor-icon-theme, so this
>   package needs to own those directories. Or perhaps a bug needs to reported 
> to
>   hicolor-icon-theme to add them.

Fixed. Just removed them since they equal not regular and doesnt have HiDPI
version for now.

> - "mo" does not appear to be a valid language code (at least according to the
>   Wikipedia list of ISO-639-1 codes). The file doesn't appear to contain any
>   translations or any metadata for what language it's supposed to be, so I
>   think it's an error on upstream's part.

This is most annoying part and often happens for me. But according this list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1
BH and MO files are there. So, maybe we should report about his in rpmlint
checker tool?

> - It appears you need to Requires:polkit for the 
> /usr/share/polkit-1{,/actions}
>   directories.

Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to