https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684



--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #8)
> From what I can see nothing changed for
> https://github.com/cc65/cc65/blob/master/src/cc65/expr.c, there should be
> details from the past either in a thread on legal list or in an old review
> bug or in the rpmfusion review. Yes, it should be this single file without
> the zlib license that blocks inclusion.

(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #10)
> Blocking FE-Legal, AFAIK expr.c isn't covered by the zlib license.

Why wouldn't it be? It's made by the same developer who has included a header
in most files, except this one.


/*****************************************************************************/
/*                                                                           */
/*                                  expr.c                                   */
/*                                                                           */
/*                 Expression evaluation for the ld65 linker                 */
/*                                                                           */
/*                                                                           */
/*                                                                           */
/* (C) 1998-2012, Ullrich von Bassewitz                                      */
/*                Roemerstrasse 52                                           */
/*                D-70794 Filderstadt                                        */
/* EMail:         u...@cc65.org                                                
*/
/*                                                                           */
/*                                                                           */
/* This software is provided 'as-is', without any expressed or implied       */
/* warranty.  In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages    */
/* arising from the use of this software.                                    */
/*                                                                           */
/* Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,     */
/* including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it    */
/* freely, subject to the following restrictions:                            */
/*                                                                           */
/* 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not   */
/*    claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software   */
/*    in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be  */
/*    appreciated but is not required.                                       */
/* 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not   */
/*    be misrepresented as being the original software.                      */
/* 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source              */
/*    distribution.                                                          */
/*                                                                           */
/*****************************************************************************/

We don't require all source files to have proper headers with the license
included.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to