https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> ---
Looks good now: XXX APPROVED XXX!

However, before you commit to SCM:

- Do you think you should include mpi4py as a requires or a weak dep? This
package seems to support MPI.
- Please report the following issues upstream and mention the issues in the
spec:
* failing doc build
* failing tests (not the one that tries to download files, that's OK)

- Please file an issue upstream discussing the version specific requires on
neo. We need to confirm what version this works with.


Cheers!
Ankur

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to