Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652533 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> 2010-11-13 18:20:27 EST --- Just a couple more things: - it's normally a good idea to have your patches be named (packagename|tarballname)-version-purpose.patch That way when someone rpm -i the srpm on their local machine, and the files end up in ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES, it's easy to see which patch belongs to which package. The versioning helps knowing which patch might be out of date (though a lot of time the same patch would apply across several new releases!) - Likewise, when applying the patch, it's useful to use the -b SUFFIX option ( backs up the file being patched with the SUFFIX, so my suffix is normally .purpose ) - Have we settled on a new name? pgRouting or pgrouting perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
