Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2010-11-15 10:28:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, they are 2 variants of the same family. Should I still produce 2 > packages? Rereading the policy "in strict mode" leads to "probably yes"... Definitely yes. You need to separate font families for the font auto-installer to work well > [First time reading it seemed silly to have a -common package for 3 doc > files.] You can skip the -common package and duplicate the doc files in the two subpackages if you prefer (just make sure to push the common requires in the subpackages so they're not lost). -common is easier to document than explaining all the subtleties of not using a common with many subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
