https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740804

Severin Gehwolf <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from Severin Gehwolf <[email protected]> ---
Thanks for the review!

(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==============
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> 
> Issues:
> =======
> - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
>   Note: sonatype-oss-parent is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
>   See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
>   guidelines/deprecating-packages/

Now removed in %prep and filed an upstream issue which I've mentioned
as a comment in spec.

> - Note: No javadoc subpackage present. Note: Javadocs are optional for
>   Fedora versions >= 21
>   See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation

Yes, optional. I don't intend to build javadocs.

> - Version in changelog is 0.6.0 but Version is 0.12.0

Fixed.

> - Package contains bundled libraries, see rpmlint Provides section

This is a Java agent package. Same reasoning applies for
prometheus-jmx-exporter
as for jolokia-jvm-agent. This package does proper name-spacing of bundled libs
which is better. Bundled provides are present as per packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to