https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744287

Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.anal...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |quantum.anal...@gmail.com
             Blocks|                            |182235 (FE-Legal)
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |quantum.anal...@gmail.com
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.anal...@gmail.com> ---
The license for this is fine, but the license for MongoDB was determined to not
be Free Software and it was removed. I believe this does not link to it, but
communicates via socket like PostgreSQL or MariaDB. But I'm tagging in legal@
just to be sure that this package is okay to include.

This is approved so long as legal is fine with it.

Please add a comment for why some tests are skipped.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No
     copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License", "Apache License (v2.0)", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified"
     License", "ISC License", "Expat License", "*No copyright* BSD 2-clause
     "Simplified" License". 1703 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in
     1744287-golang-mongodb-mongo-driver/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
     Note: Macros in: golang-mongodb-mongo-driver (description)
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-mongodb-mongo-driver-1.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
          golang-mongodb-mongo-driver-1.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docbuilder
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
godriver-benchmark
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary operationgen
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.src: E: specfile-error warning: -u use in
%forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm
variables!
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: golang-mongodb-mongo-driver-debuginfo-1.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docbuilder
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
godriver-benchmark
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary operationgen
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-go-driver/archive/v1.1.0/mongo-go-driver-1.1.0.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
efa95ebece5904b1d8d5aeca8ff43d96afd805a60aaa29c89d2ff7562989a7be
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
efa95ebece5904b1d8d5aeca8ff43d96afd805a60aaa29c89d2ff7562989a7be


Requires
--------
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
golang-mongodb-mongo-driver:
    golang-mongodb-mongo-driver
    golang-mongodb-mongo-driver(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1744287 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -L
mongo-driver
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic
Disabled plugins: Python, Haskell, SugarActivity, Java, R, PHP, Perl, fonts,
Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Built with local dependencies:
    mongo-driver/golang-github-gobuffalo-logger-devel-1.0.1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
    mongo-driver/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel-2.5.2-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
    mongo-driver/golang-github-tidwall-pretty-devel-1.0.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
    mongo-driver/golang-github-gobuffalo-packd-devel-0.3.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to