https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752288
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> ---
Naming: Coin4 → coin4
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming]
Provides:Coin4 can be added.
Requires: zlib-devel bzip2-devel
→ one per line please
%description devel → there should be a dot at the end of the text.
Looks all nice. Though I wonder one thing: is is worth to bother with
alternatives?
Maybe just make coin*-devel packages Conflict with each other? The user doesn't
get
much benefit either way: it is still not possible to build against multiple
Coin versions
at the same time, and conflicting packages are easier to implement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
