https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582

Christopher Engelhard <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?([email protected])       |



--- Comment #11 from Christopher Engelhard <[email protected]> ---
Thanks for sniffing around for fnv/simclist, also for setting FE-NEEDSPONSOR, I
forgot that.

I've added fnv & simclist as bundled provides.

spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lcts/sshguard/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01042870-sshguard/sshguard.spec
diff 2.4.0-8 -> 2.4.0-9:
https://gitlab.com/lcts-rpm/sshguard/compare/sshguard-2.4.0-8...sshguard-2.4.0-9
src.rpm:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lcts/sshguard/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01042870-sshguard/sshguard-2.4.0-9.fc32.src.rpm

fnv: sshguard doesn't bundle the entire library, only one specific 32bit hash
function. Is it still OK to use bundled(fnv)? 

simclist: The 1.6 version of simclist most likely comes from the author's page
on sourceforge [1], it was released in 2011, so similarly ancient. I'll contact
the dev to verify.

[1] http://freshmeat.sourceforge.net/projects/simclist

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to