https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757379
--- Comment #4 from Alessio <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #1) > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > ... > - setup.py says MIT and the LICENSE file is MIT: > ... > - The pynetdicom/_version.py file says that some part of the code there is > Apache and BSD. So, what is the right license? License: MIT and ASL 2.0 and BSD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
