https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #29 from Jun Aruga <[email protected]> --- > Nor do I, but it shouldn't be. Now I see not see the issue on my latest spec file. > If you're not convinced, I should ask on the devel list, or at Red Hat, where there are libc maintainers. Yes, please. Thank you. Have you read below conversation? There are 2 patterns both glib pattern and zlib pattern. https://github.com/samtools/htslib/issues/932 Could you send pull-request to junaruga/htslib-pkg hotfix/review branch as you like? Or just show me diff info? https://github.com/junaruga/htslib-pkg/tree/hotfix/review $ git clone [email protected]:junaruga/htslib-pkg.git $ cd htslib-pkg $ git checkout hotfix/review I am okay to follow your preference to finish the reviewing process. Because we can change spec file later if something needs to be changed after your clarification. As there are blocker tickets waiting this ticket, I want to finish it as soon as possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
