Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> 2010-11-17 16:08:01 EST --- At 10, these are the times from three runs: atof time = 451 fast_atof Time = 273 old fast_atof time = 476 The fast method isn't at least three times as fast as atof() atof time = 428 fast_atof Time = 310 old fast_atof time = 531 The fast method isn't at least three times as fast as atof() atof time = 406 fast_atof Time = 309 old fast_atof time = 490 The fast method isn't at least three times as fast as atof() Averaged: atof time = 428.3 fast_atof Time = 297.3 old fast_atof time = 499 The fast_atof time with the assimp patch and AI_FAST_ATOF_RELAVANT_DECIMALS 10 is approx 1.4x faster than glibc atof. Approx 1.7x faster than stock 1.7.2 fast_atof. Does assimp have a preferred default? I think we'd need to be higher than 6 to get it merged, but these numbers look pretty good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
