https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #45 from Jun Aruga <jar...@redhat.com> --- Dave, how you think about the fact of the libraries that is same pattern with upstream htslib? I do not think that your concern is valid considering the fact at the moment. ``` $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libz.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so -> libz.so.1.2.11* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 -> libz.so.1.2.11* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128904 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.11* $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libz.so zlib-devel-1.2.11-17.fc30.x86_64 $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 zlib-1.2.11-17.fc30.x86_64 $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.11 zlib-1.2.11-17.fc30.x86_64 ``` Please join to discuss with us on following page, if you would like to change the reviewer's decision. https://github.com/samtools/htslib/issues/932#issuecomment-537694737 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
