https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761576



--- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang <[email protected]> ---
> - Do you really need to provide static libraries? There are usually not
provided in Fedora.


I personally like linking with static libraries because it makes the software
more portable. So, if possible, I would like to provide the .a


>- Use install -p to keep timestamps

Got it


>- To avoid unintentional soname bump, we forbid globbing the major soname
version, be more specific instead:

>%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.*


Can you clarify this a little bit? Did you mean I should replace 
lib%{name}.so with libzmat.so? Or I must name this library to something else?
Does this also apply to the .a file as well?

Let me know, I can update the spec file.


>- Probably need to delete that:

pwd
ls easylzma-0.0.8/include/

Yes, those were for debugging purposes


> - I see the GPL license file, but where does the or BSD come from?

I placed the code under dual license of gpl and bsd.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to