https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759940

Jun Aruga <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(John.W.Marshall@g
                   |                            |lasgow.ac.uk)



--- Comment #14 from Jun Aruga <[email protected]> ---
Hi John,

> You are right. Let me change the spec file later.

I sent a pull-request to Fedora repository about your configure script's
suggestion.
Could you review or comment below page? Thanks.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/htslib/pull-request/1

> The file format man pages (sam.5 etc) are aimed at users of tools eg
> samtools, not only at developers using the API. So IMHO they would fit
> better in the htslib-tools subpackage alongside the other manual pages.

Currently htslib-tools sub package is for binary tools such as bgzip, htsfile
and tabix binary commands.
I am not comforable to add the file format man page files (= man5 [1]) to the
htslib-tools.

Right now I am checking other spec file's situation for man5 files.

* libreport.spec
  main package
* libbind.spec
  devel sub package
* libguestfs.spec
  tools-c sub package
* libpng.spec
  main package
* libselinux.spec
  utils sub package

[1] https://linux.die.net/man/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to