https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763147
Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> --- * Package named correctly * Packaging the latest version * License text included * License okay for Fedora * Builds fine in mock * SPEC file clean and concise * rpmlint reasonably happy 1.) The license is not clear There doesn't seem to be any word in documentation or source files about how they are licensed. The MIT license file is just there, with no indication about how is it relevant. Please ask upstream to clarify this, preferrably by including a comment in the source files about how are they licensed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
