https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> --- - Bump to 0.7.2, Package approved, in accord with Petr Schindler review. @Petr Schindler I would mark these as [-] as they are not really relevant to current SPEC: [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
