https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
CC| |zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |zebo...@gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> ---
- Bump to 0.7.2,
Package approved, in accord with Petr Schindler review.
@Petr Schindler I would mark these as [-] as they are not really relevant to
current SPEC:
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
