Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760 --- Comment #3 from Domingo Becker <[email protected]> 2010-11-19 23:31:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > As requested, picking up this review. Also, FE-NEEDSPONSOR is not needed > anymore. Fixed. > Let's start from the basics. > > The md5 for the tarball in your src.rpm does not match the upstream one. > Please > be sure to include in the srpm the unmodified tar.gz from upstream. The > easiest > way is to use "spectool -g django-ajax-selects.spec" to download it. Fixed. New tarball downloaded with spectool -g > Upstream looks a bit confused about licensing: pypi lists lgpl, google code > MIT, while the LICENSE.txt claims it's dual licensed MIT and GPL. > > However, what counts is what's actually in the tarball, so please advice him > to > include the licenses text in the package and, preferably, add an header on > each > source file with the indication of the license. It will be informed upstream. > Our License: tag should be "MIT or GPL+" since dual licensing means you can > choose which one to apply (so the "or") and not stating explicitly which GPL > version to use means you can pick any. Fixed. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-ajax-selects.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
