https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580



--- Comment #6 from jiri vanek <jva...@redhat.com> ---
btw, there is openjfx package. Do yo  mind to clarify the coexistence of those
two? I guess openjfx is, and will rewamin for jdk8, where this openjfx-11 will
be for jdk11...and up?
In that moment the weuestion arise, how to deal with those. Will you rename the
package with jdk14 and/or 17?
Also I believe your package *is* working with anything we build under
java-latest-openjdk, so you should require java >=11, but in that moment the
name is wrong.

To have it working flawlessly, we had this in openjdk8 for openjfx(8):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=20202175
That is a binding subpackage (coantains only symlinks). Is something like that
wortky for 11+?

 dnf install javafx
Last metadata expiration check: 1:09:27 ago on Wed 19 Feb 2020 09:58:11 AM CET.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package                      Arch     Version                  Repo       Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx   x86_64   1:1.8.0.242.b08-0.fc31   updates    34 k
Installing dependencies:
 openjfx                      x86_64   8.0.202-8.b07.fc31       fedora    8.7 M

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  2 Packages


Before review itself, we have to clarify the system integration. From this
point of view, you step into a  self-contianed change :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to