Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson <[email protected]> 2010-11-24 00:06:13 EST --- I certainly never heard anything about most things defaulting to multilib. I'll check with Jesse I think. It didn't seem neat to ship a tarball with nothing changed but the 'bad stuff' removed, because that tarball would in itself be useless; it'd completely fail to compile. It seems odd to ship a package which contains a source tarball that's useless and requires further changes from the spec to work at all. I'm not sure if there's an 'official' preferred process here, I'll see if I can find anything. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
