https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858



--- Comment #6 from Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Fabiano FidĂȘncio from comment #3)
> (In reply to Fabiano FidĂȘncio from comment #2)
> 
> > So, comments made, may I ask your take on those? Is there some specific
> > reason behind the dir structure chosen for kata-agent binary and systemd
> > files?
> 
> And, of course there is a specific reason for that, explicitly mentioned in
> the spec file:
> # Install the whole kata agent rooted in /usr/libexec
> # The whole tree is copied into the appliance

Yup, and it allows us to use kata-agent 'make' to install the files for us.
If we wanted to use a different file hierarchy, we would need to manually
reimplement the install process which isn't future proof. FWIW I did something
similar for kata-osbuilder initially but it required some hacks there so
this was my workaround

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to