Neal Gompa <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
              Flags|                            |needinfo?

--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa <> ---
> # License: CC-BY-SA
> #

I'm not sure this is an okay license for spec files. Creative Commons
discourages the usage of CC licenses for code. The FPCA already defaults spec
files to be licensed MIT[1], can you license it as something that makes more
sense for code?


You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
package-review mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:

Reply via email to