https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265

Till Hofmann <thofm...@fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |thofm...@fedoraproject.org
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #6 from Till Hofmann <thofm...@fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to Aleksei Bavshin from comment #4)
> 
> Also, technically that makes package not installable on Fedora < 32 without
> sway module. It's safe to ignore f30 (EOL by the end of May) and epel8 (does
> not even have sway modular builds), but f31 is still supported for a while.
> However if we allow installation with older sway it would only serve as a
> source of confusion and bug reports.
> I admit that I don't know a good solution for that besides outright ignoring
> f31.

That's a perfectly valid solution. New packages don't have to be shipped with
all active releases.
We can still include the package in the module.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to