https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] --- (In reply to mark.olesen from comment #11) > Currently rebuilding with the various suggested changes, with > /usr/lib/openfoam for the common root (instead of /opt). I cannot find the relevent guidelines right now, but it would be better if you would put header files in /usr/include/openfoam<v>. Also, you should probably use %{_libdir} rather then hard-coding /usr/lib/ so that /usr/lib64 is used on 64bit systems. Another reason is https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros > I would still ideally like to have some more granularity in subpackages, > similar to my current section of .deb files. > However, I'm not sure if the interdependencies can be properly described in > a single .spec file. This is no issue. See e.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nest/blob/master/f/nest.spec which does this. > > The subpackages > - myPackage-develop : source code headers and project-specific build scripts. Probably should be called myPackage-devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
