https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <m...@fabian-affolter.ch> ---
Package Review
==============
- The license is GPLv3+ (either version 3, or (at your option) any later
version.)
- Descriptions (%description static) should end with a period and %description
is too long (see rpmlint ouput)
- COPYING is in %doc and %license, should only be in %license
- "Source0:" could be replaced with
%{url}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- NEWS could be part of the package, AUTHORS.libfswatch, NEWS.libfswatch
andvREADME.libfswatch.md of the -devel package
- The package should own %{_includedir}/lib%{name}/*
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v3 or later)", "FSF All
Permissive License", "GNU Free Documentation License", "GNU Free
Documentation License (v1.3 or later)". 31 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1827880-fswatch/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/include/libfswatch
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/libfswatch
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
present.
Note: Package has .a files: fswatch-static.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in fswatch-
static
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: fswatch-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
fswatch-devel-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
fswatch-static-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
fswatch-debuginfo-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
fswatch-debugsource-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
fswatch-1.14.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
fswatch.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C fswatch is a file change monitor
that receives notifications when the contents of the specified files or
directories are modified.
fswatch-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C The fswatch-devel package
contains libraries and headers for developing applications that use libfswatch.
fswatch-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
fswatch-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfswatch ->
wristwatch
fswatch-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
fswatch.src: E: description-line-too-long C fswatch is a file change monitor
that receives notifications when the contents of the specified files or
directories are modified.
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: fswatch-debuginfo-1.14.0-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
fswatch-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfswatch ->
wristwatch
fswatch-static.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
fswatch-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
fswatch.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C fswatch is a file change monitor
that receives notifications when the contents of the specified files or
directories are modified.
fswatch.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch
<urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
fswatch-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
fswatch-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
fswatch-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C The fswatch-devel package
contains libraries and headers for developing applications that use libfswatch.
fswatch-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
fswatch-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch/archive/1.14.0/1.14.0.tar.gz#/fswatch-1.14.0.tar.gz
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
c4f5ef92e79dda7e50c1ded42784791ef536c99684f3d677f6621fe73ee857d2
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
c4f5ef92e79dda7e50c1ded42784791ef536c99684f3d677f6621fe73ee857d2
Requires
--------
fswatch (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libfswatch.so.11()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
fswatch-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
fswatch(x86-64)
libfswatch.so.11()(64bit)
fswatch-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
fswatch-devel(x86-64)
fswatch-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
fswatch-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
fswatch:
fswatch
fswatch(x86-64)
libfswatch.so.11()(64bit)
fswatch-devel:
fswatch-devel
fswatch-devel(x86-64)
fswatch-static:
fswatch-static
fswatch-static(x86-64)
fswatch-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
fswatch-debuginfo
fswatch-debuginfo(x86-64)
fswatch-debugsource:
fswatch-debugsource
fswatch-debugsource(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1827880
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic
Disabled plugins: Perl, R, Haskell, fonts, Java, Python, SugarActivity, Ocaml,
PHP
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
