https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834947
--- Comment #5 from Igor Raits <igor.ra...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #4) > >We (rust-sig) are usually, when updating rust stuff, just regenerate spec > >and using `git add -p` to just commit changes > Well yeah, if the preferred workflow is something semi-automated like this, > then it makes sense to keep the spec as close to the auto-generated one as > possible. I'll keep this in mind if I ever need to package Rust stuff again. Hopefully soon, the spec will look like: Version: 1.2.3 Type: crate and it will do all the stuff behind the scene :) We are aiming to automate generation of subpackages in RPM upstream, though it can take months until this will be done. > > >Please let me know if you are fine that I will add @rust-sig as default BZ > >assignee and into the maintainers list. > Sure. Cool, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
