https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #6 from Honggang LI <ho...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to igor.ivanov.va from comment #5) > Thank you for review > > libvma.spec has been updated accordingly. > > There are a couple of notes: > 1. After applying changes to meet > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets > requirements > rpmlint reports error: > libvma.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libvma.so.9.0.2 > This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call > ldconfig. > > libvma.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libvma.so.9.0.2 > This package contains a library and its %postun doesn't call ldconfig. > That's OK, as it is a rpmlint bug. > I am using rpmlint version 1.10 on fc30 > > 2. I would like to avoid putting man page for executable 'vma_stats' at the > moment unless it must be done. Yes, it is necessary. Please try search with key words " Man page scan results" in bugzilla. It gives 441 bugs for me. That means 441 bugs had been opened to handle manpage like this. https://pagure.io/ManualPageScan/ $ rpm -qpl libvma*rpm | grep bin /usr/sbin/vma /usr/sbin/vmad /usr/bin/vma_stats /usr/sbin/vma is a bash script. It is OK to ignore manpage for it. But vmad and vma_stats are executables, we should provide manpage for them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
