Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts <[email protected]> 2010-12-01 18:06:35 EST --- Depends; I haven't built the package to see if the MIT-license code appears by itself in any binary files. I also didn't audit for GPLv3 vs. GPLv3+. That's all something you need to do. I was just commenting on the fact that your comments before the license tag refer to the source code, when what's important is the licenses on the files in the binary package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
