https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mat Booth from comment #3)
> > Err... Probably. "8" is the last version before they added deps on stuff not
> > in Fedora
> 
> That's probably a good guess ... thanks for updating it.
> It would probably be good to unbundle jbcrypt in the long run, but bundling
> one (!) file for now is fine with me.
> Not sure if it's necessary to ship the actual ISC license text with the
> package, but I don't think the license requires it.
> 
> > Yeah that's fair
> 
> Since version was effectively bumped from 217 to 217.21, you should also
> reset Release number to 1 (also in the Changelog message).
> 
> > > 
> > > A comment in the .spec file that the package is built from the Jenkins 
> > > fork
> > > of trilead-ssh2 (and why?) is enough.
> > 
> > Comment added
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > See updated spec file:
> > 
> > Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/trilead-ssh2.spec
> > SRPM URL:
> > https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/trilead-ssh2-217.21-14.fc33.src.rpm
> 
> 
> I've ran the fedora-review tool and looked at the .spec file, and everything
> seems to be in order, except one thing:
> 
> One file is recognised by licensecheck to be under an "NTP License":
> trilead-ssh2-trilead-ssh2-build-217-jenkins-21/src/com/trilead/ssh2/crypto/
> digest/MD5.java
> 
> The license header in this class looks unlike anything I've seen before, and
> I don't know how to categorize it.
> NTP License is not listed under fedora's "Good" or "Bad" Licenses either ...

NTP is just MIT:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XSDPIYGEEIVMTJCKPGAL6UCC6DKJHZGK/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to