https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--- Comment #13 from Fabien Boucher <fbouc...@redhat.com> --- Hi Robert-André, thanks for the review. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #12) > - Remove shebangs for > > zuul.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/zuul/ansible/base/library/command.py 644 > /usr/bin/python3 > zuul.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/zuul/ansible/base/library/zuul_console.py > 644 /usr/bin/python3 For this one I have an upstream patch that does not pass the upstream CI https://review.opendev.org/728955/ . It seems that removing the shebang create unexpected issues ... So I need to dig more into that weird issue if that's a packaging blocker. > - Add a logrotate file for your log See > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > #_logrotate_config_file This is a point where a I have a doubt. The Python logging file provided by the package ensures the rotation https://fbo.fedorapeople.org/zuul/logging.conf. Should I remove the use of 'TimedRotatingFileHandler' and move on logrotate ? > - Own this dir: > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /etc/zuul > This should be fixed: the "%dir %attr(0755,zuul,zuul) %{_sysconfdir}/zuul" was missing. > > > Package Review > ============== > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > ======= > - Package installs properly. > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > ===== MUST items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* > Apache License 2.0 GPL (v3.0)", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", > "Expat License", "GPL (v3 or later)". 1645 files have unknown license. > Detailed output of licensecheck in > /home/bob/packaging/review/zuul/review-zuul/licensecheck.txt > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /etc/zuul > [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. > [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. > [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. > [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package > [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. > [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory > names). > [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. > [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. > [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. > [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. > [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines > [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least > one supported primary architecture. > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). > [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package is included in %license. > [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the > beginning of %install. > [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. > [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. > [x]: Dist tag is present. > [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. > [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't > work. > [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. > [x]: No %config files under /usr. > [x]: Package is not relocatable. > [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. > [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec. > [x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and > systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files. > Note: Systemd service file(s) in zuul-scheduler, zuul-merger, zuul- > web, zuul-executor, zuul-fingergw > [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. > [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. > [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local > > Python: > [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build > process. > [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should > provide egg info. > [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python > [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel > [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on > packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly > versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST > use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. > [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files > [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > Generic: > [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in zuul- > webui , zuul-scheduler , zuul-merger , zuul-web , zuul-executor , > zuul-fingergw , zuul-migrate > [?]: Package functions as described. > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise > justified. > [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. > [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream > publishes signatures. > Note: gpgverify is not used. > [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures. > [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. > [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed > files. > [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > [x]: Buildroot is not present > [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag > [x]: SourceX is a working URL. > [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > > > Rpmlint > ------- > Checking: zuul-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-webui-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-scheduler-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-merger-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-web-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-executor-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-fingergw-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-migrate-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-doc-3.19.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > zuul-3.19.0-1.fc33.src.rpm > zuul.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/zuul/logging.conf zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zuul/logging.conf zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/zuul/main.yaml zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zuul/main.yaml zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/zuul/zuul.conf zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zuul/zuul.conf zuul > zuul.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/zuul/zuul.conf 640 > zuul.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/zuul/ansible/base/library/command.py 644 > /usr/bin/python3 > zuul.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/zuul/ansible/base/library/zuul_console.py > 644 /usr/bin/python3 > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul/.ssh zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul/.ssh zuul > zuul.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/zuul/.ssh > zuul.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/zuul/.ssh > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul/ansible zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul/ansible zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul/keys zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul/keys zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/zuul zuul > zuul.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/zuul zuul > zuul.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/zuul'] > zuul.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul > zuul.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-bwrap > zuul-webui.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-scheduler.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gearman -> > gear man, gear-man, germane > zuul-scheduler.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-scheduler.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-scheduler > zuul-merger.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-merger.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-merger > zuul-web.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-web.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-web > zuul-executor.noarch: E: devel-dependency libffi-devel > zuul-executor.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libffi-devel > zuul-executor.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-executor.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul/ansible zuul > zuul-executor.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul/ansible zuul > zuul-executor.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zuul/executor zuul > zuul-executor.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zuul/executor zuul > zuul-executor.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-executor > zuul-executor.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-manage-ansible > zuul-fingergw.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-fingergw.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-fingergw > zuul-migrate.noarch: W: no-documentation > zuul-migrate.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zuul-migrate > zuul-doc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/zuul-doc/html/objects.inv > 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 42 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
