Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659972 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Junghans <[email protected]> 2010-12-05 05:56:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Christoph: you'll need to make a review request for votca-tools, as well. The request can be found under bug #660061 > You're not a Fedora packager yet, right? Yes, but I would like to stay on the upstream side and get involved if something needs to be added to the official votca release. > > - And usually if libraries (%_libdir/libfoo.so.X*) are splitted out > > into -libs subpackage, the main package has "R: -libs = %version-%release" > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > > (In this case the "base" package is -libs). > > e.g. file has "R: file-libs = %version-%release", many others do so > Hmm, Mamoru seems to have a point here. Although, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > clearly states: > "Packages must not contain explicit Requires on libraries except when > absolutely necessary." This seems correct to me due to the fact that dynamically linked binaries will need the shared library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
