https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862895
José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jama...@fc.up.pt
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |jama...@fc.up.pt
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> ---
Speaking of déjà vu:
fedora-review says:
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
Repeating what I had said previously in other reviews it seems OK to follow the
dependency from R-devel -> R-core-devel.
The license is correct and the spec is well written and follows the Fedora
packaging guidelines.
So the package is approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
