https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867321



--- Comment #3 from Igor Raits <[email protected]> ---
New Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon-1.1.2-1.fc33.src.rpm

--- Comment #3 from Igor Raits <[email protected]> ---
Hi Andy,

Thank you for review! For sure ansible-collections-netbox-netbox is my package
and I am creator of all those packaging-related macros for Ansible :)

> licensecheck reports extra licenses:

I somehow did not notice this, I've fixed it in spec and also opened issue in
upstream https://github.com/ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon/issues/116.

> Is the "python3-rpm-macros" package not needed by the netcommon Ansible 
> module?

No, it was needed there only for %{python3_version} macro that is used in
Requires.

> I noticed that ansible-collection-netbox-netbox in addition removes the 
> integration tests and does some sed cleanup magic:

Yeah, probably we should do same, fixed.

> I somehow don't think Ansible uses these internally, but I might be wrong. If 
> these are not actually a part of the package, they should be removed.

Fixed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to