https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870208
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Valena <[email protected]> --- Thank you for your reviews! > - What is the reason to include vips-devel instead of just vips? You're right, I thought I needed headers, but I don't. > - I think there should be something aka `Requires: vips` Yes, you're right. I've tried using it in the test suite of image_processing gem (which succeeds). > * Wrong shebangs: Hmm. I've already fixed that (I've linked probably an earlier iteration of spec file by mistake). Refreshed SPEC and SRPM with the changes (the release bump is just for COPR). Spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01619049-rubygem-ruby-vips/rubygem-ruby-vips.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01619049-rubygem-ruby-vips/rubygem-ruby-vips-2.0.17-2.fc34.src.rpm Builds & Test log: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/7dc8d06603fc58c7f207cd854a1d4b8d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
