https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881370

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?([email protected]
                   |                            |om)



--- Comment #4 from [email protected] ---
Notes:

- [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
  file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

  I think it's fine in this case since there is only one source file, which
contains license information.

- Please pay attention to rpmlint output.

  wwl.x86_64: W: invalid-license Semi-Permissive
  should be fine

  wwl.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/wwl.1.gz
  should be fixed

  wwl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hamradio -> ham radio,
ham-radio, radiogram
  should be fine if you think this is the correct way to spell it

  (none): E: no installed packages by name wwl
  Not sure about this one. Rather looks like the fedora-review tool problem
than the package itself


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to