https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290



--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Dave Olsthoorn from comment #8)
> Since I was looking at libcamera for another project I rebased the spec file
> and made some other changes:
> - Add %check, it passed locally, but somehow not on koji
> - Splitting the existing package into muliple packages: separate docs, ipa
> modules and utilities
> - Disabling LTO, it broke the tests in %check
> - Adding some BuildRequires for new things: qcam, gstreamer plugin, ipa
> module signing and more
> Feel free to ignore if you don't want the changes I made:
> 
> SPEC:
> https://daveo.fedorapeople.org/review/libcamera/0.0.0-0.2.6f09a61/libcamera.
> spec
> SRPM:
> https://daveo.fedorapeople.org/review/libcamera/0.0.0-0.2.6f09a61/libcamera-
> 0.0.0-0.2.6f09a61.fc34.src.rpm
> 
> FAS: daveo
> 
> koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51300458

Youneed to work with PRobinson on this, I can't approved a package for someone
who is not the reporter.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to