https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885684
Bug ID: 1885684
Summary: Review Request: rocm-smi - AMD ROCm System Management
Interface
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
QA Contact: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://gitlab.com/musicinmybrain/rocm-smi-rpm/-/raw/master/rocm-smi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6769/52876769/rocm-smi-3.8.0-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description: AMD ROCm System Management Interface
Fedora Account System Username: music
This is a command-line tool for clock and temperature management of a ROCm
enabled system, i.e., one with an AMD GPU.
It does not directly depend on the AMDGPU (open-source) or AMDGPU-PRO
(proprietary) GPU driver; instead, it is a monolithic pure-Python script that
interacts with any supported GPU via sysfs.
Koji build for Fedora 34:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52876746
Koji build for Fedora 33:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52876923
Koji build for Fedora 32:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52877091
Koji build for EPEL8:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52877312
Koji build for EPEL7:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52877482
----
This is my first package for Fedora, and I am seeking a sponsor. As instructed
on https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/, I will apply for sponsorship once the
package review process is completed for this package. Once the package is in
Fedora, I plan to request EPEL branches as well. I have also added the upstream
package to release monitoring: https://release-monitoring.org/project/138112/.
While I have about a decade of experience with RPM packaging, this has
generally not been public work. I offer the following recent contributions to
demonstrate my understanding of RPM packaging and of Fedora guidelines and
processes.
My PR to build rasqal against system libraries (libgcrypt) instead of using
bundled cryptographic hash implementations was accepted, resolving a
six-year-old issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099251.
My PR to unbundle mathjax from spyder was accepted, resolving a seven-year-old
issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017213.
I fixed a couple of cases where applications showed a generic fallback icon
under GNOME/Wayland. In the case of spyder, the correct fix was to make an
upstream bug report and supply an upstream PR, which was accepted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832579. In the case of
boinc-client, the correct fix was a change in the Fedora packaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880553.
I have also written a spec file for the SLEEF Vectorized Math Library, which
demonstrates my ability to correctly handle more complicated packages than this
one: https://gitlab.com/musicinmybrain/sleef-rpm/-/blob/master/sleef.spec. I
have not submitted a review request for that package because there are still a
few unresolved test failures on the s390x platform.
Thanks for your time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
