https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495
--- Comment #2 from Yogaraj Alamenda <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1) > Just some quick comments: > > - The URL for the SPEC file needs to point to a raw text for fedora-review > to work. > - Remove the license from the SPEC file header. > - qatlib is not present in the Fedora Package Collection. > - This package needs to provide a -devel subpackage Thanks, Comments inline. - The URL for the SPEC file needs to point to a raw text for fedora-review to work. [YA] Do we need to upload the spec file in some place in Fedora system for review ? - Remove the license from the SPEC file header. [YA] Is it mandatory that license headers cannot be there. If yes we will remove it - qatlib is not present in the Fedora Package Collection. [YA] The review is still in progress for qatlib and SRPM can be downloaded from https://github.com/intel/qatlib/releases/download/20.08.0/qatlib-20.08.0-0.1.fc32.src.rpm - This package needsto provide a -devel subpackage [YA] There is no other entities that need QAT Engine headers, only library is sufficient so devel package is not included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
