https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886858
Andy Mender <andymenderu...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender <andymenderu...@gmail.com> ---
> I respect your suggestion. However, I have to say that I have never seen the
> Fedora guidelines encourage the creation of upstream forks, [...]
What I was trying to say was that if the project is worth it, but is completely
unmaintained and you might have the time and/or know-how to maintain it, it
would be worthwhile to fork it. It's indirectly mentioned in "Unmaintained Or
Unresponsive Upstream Projects" from the guidelines you posted. Before that
happens, of course, upstream should be informed and that discussed with them
properly, and indicated that the project is a fork in the SPEC file.
As for the review, very thoroughly done. Package approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
