https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901000
--- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > I noticed that the extra subpackages use "+" as a separator. Shouldn't they > use "-" instead or are these flavors of the -server package? > That's the way Fedora has chosen to name the extras provided by the package. Everything is made automatically by the macro: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_python_extras > > Name: python-%{srcname} > > Version: 3.0.0 > > Release: 1.b2%{?dist} > > The "b2" part should be in the Version field, I think. It's not a part of > the Fedora package Release tag, but rather of the version string of the > upstream package. > No, 3.0.0b2 does not sort properly, since 3.0.0 will be lower: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_unsortable_versions 'b2' must go in <extraver>. > Upstream provides tests in the PyPi tarball. Can these be added to the SPEC > file under %check or do they require external binaries, like a server daemon? > Can't run tests, since sanic package isn't available > The rest looks okay. Package approved. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
