https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908039
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the review, Dan. (In reply to dan.cermak from comment #1) > I've approved the package, only one small heads-up: the package appears to > contain two gplv3+ licensed files. I guess that this might be a mistake from > the past, so I've opened an issue about that upstream: > https://github.com/java-diff-utils/java-diff-utils/issues/111. I don't think > that it is necessary to add the GPL to the license field, but please do as > you see best fit. Neither of the GPLv3+ files goes into the binary RPMs, so I think that's okay. They're files used for testing only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
