https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908038
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #6) > Thanks, Dan. I have added a license file to the main package and removed > the duplicate javadocs from the main package. The URLs are the same. The > fixed version is building in COPR now. Hm, fedora-review is still complaining about the directory ownership. However, it's only about /usr/share/licenses/jline2 so I think that should be ok. Thanks for bringing jline2 back! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
