https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911780
José Matos <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from José Matos <[email protected]> --- The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file is simple and correct. fedora-review complains: - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION - Package requires R-core. The only pattern that I am seeing here is the number of 0.1.1 packages that are introduced in the updates of R packages. :-) After reviewing so many packages the other thing that shows up is that probably the %install section could get a macro on R-rpm-macros since this chunk appears so many times: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{rlibdir} %{_bindir}/R CMD INSTALL -l %{buildroot}%{rlibdir} %{packname} test -d %{packname}/src && (cd %{packname}/src; rm -f *.o *.so) rm -f %{buildroot}%{rlibdir}/R.css The package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
