Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> 2010-12-16 11:06:11 EST --- That was lazy of me, I should have run rpmlint myself. New links: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/sigar.spec http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/matahari/fedora-14/SRPMS/sigar-1.6.5-0.1.git833ca18.fc14.src.rpm New rpmlint output: [04:54 PM] beek...@f13 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES # rpmlint fedora-14/x86_64/sigar-*.5* ../SPECS/sigar.spec sigar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uptime -> optime, up time, up-time sigar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, login, loins These first two warnings are bogus spelling "errors". sigar.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libsigar.so libsigar.so Upstream has no concept of SO versioning and I am loathed to invent one. I'm prepared to work with upstream to get this added, however until that time I would prefer to leave it unversioned. sigar.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsigar.so e...@glibc_2.2.5 The use of exit() appears to be intentional and appropriate. ../SPECS/sigar.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: sigar-1.6.5-833ca18.tbz2 The last refers to the tarball. Unfortunately we need to use git archives as the published tarballs do not support cmake and the diff to the last release is massive. This and the steps for regenerating the tarball have been included in the spec file. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
