https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856005
--- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> --- Getting very close - just 3 things to fix. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/dmtcp See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files Replace: %dir %{_pkgdocdir} %{_pkgdocdir} with: %{_pkgdocdir}/ This will include %{_pkgdocdir} and everything in it and ensure that it is a directory. - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/orion/1856005-dmtcp/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ Looks like the tarball in the srpm is different from what you get when you download the source url. This should be fixed. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [-]: Package contains no static executables. - exception granted [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "Expat License [generated file]", "Apache License 2.0", "GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 or later", "LaTeX Project Public License", "[generated file]", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]". 509 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/orion/1856005-dmtcp/licensecheck.txt Please change License to and add the following comment: # dmtcp.h is ASL-2.0 License: LGPLv3+ and ASL-2.0 [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.x86_64.rpm dmtcp-devel-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.x86_64.rpm dmtcp-debuginfo-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.x86_64.rpm dmtcp-debugsource-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.x86_64.rpm dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.src.rpm dmtcp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint dmtcp.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/mtcp_restart dmtcp.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_pid.so dmtcp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation dmtcp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint dmtcp.src: W: file-size-mismatch dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1.tar.gz = 1538162, http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dmtcp/2.6.1/dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1.tar.gz = 1382085 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: dmtcp-debuginfo-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- dmtcp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation dmtcp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint dmtcp.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/mtcp_restart dmtcp.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_pid.so 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. Unversioned so-files -------------------- dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_alloc.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_batch-queue.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_dl.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_ipc.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_modify-env.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_pathvirt.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_pid.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_svipc.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_timer.so dmtcp: /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libdmtcp_unique-ckpt.so Source checksums ---------------- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dmtcp/2.6.1/dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 671130c39f426b17d6453e170ee9243d8664f6c28fbb1376aad56e09cc6e514a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4fa92d711609c945c3f6364f3824cd9b315f3c9ef3ad877888e8d45597504661 diff -r also reports differences Requires -------- dmtcp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/bash ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) dmtcp-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): dmtcp(x86-64) dmtcp-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): dmtcp-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- dmtcp: dmtcp dmtcp(x86-64) libdmtcp.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_alloc.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_batch-queue.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_dl.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_ipc.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_modify-env.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_pathvirt.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_pid.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_svipc.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_timer.so()(64bit) libdmtcp_unique-ckpt.so()(64bit) dmtcp-devel: dmtcp-devel dmtcp-devel(x86-64) dmtcp-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) dmtcp-debuginfo dmtcp-debuginfo(x86-64) dmtcp-debugsource: dmtcp-debugsource dmtcp-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1856005 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: fonts, SugarActivity, PHP, Haskell, Perl, Ocaml, Python, R, Java Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
