https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928654

Mikolaj Izdebski <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski <[email protected]> ---
Spec file looks fine - tt follows packaging guidelines, including Java
guidelines.
Source code it the SRPM matches upstream code.
Package builds fine in rawhide.
Buildrequires are correct, except that BR on maven-enforcer-plugin seems to be
unnecessary and it can be removed.
Auto-requires are generated, manual requires are absent.

rpmlint output:
ongres-stringprep.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

The code is licensed under BSD license, which matches License tag in spec file.
License text is installed as %license.
License review reveals references to ASL 2.0 license, but it only applies to
external dependency (Apache Velocity), which is not bundled in the package.

Package is APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to