https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933472
Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-SQL-Abstract-Pg-1.0-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.1) 1 perl(parent) 1 perl(SQL::Abstract) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(utf8) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-SQL-Abstract-Pg-1.0-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(SQL::Abstract::Pg) = 1.0 1 perl-SQL-Abstract-Pg = 1.0-1.fc35 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-SQL-Abstract-Pg* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok TODO: Please consider to move LICENSE for %doc to %license in %files section The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Resolution: Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
