https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
--- Comment #6 from Lyes Saadi <[email protected]> --- First, sorry for the late answer... > - The fonts files could be replaced with symbolic links to the fonts > provided by texlive fonts packages. > This is a Should item so I wouldn't block the package on that alone. I've looked more into it, but, unfortunately, I am unable to find them under the ttf extension. The closest I've got is with texlive-amsfonts which distributes the fonts under the tfm, afm, pfm, pfb and mf extensions. Though, I have been able to find in the lyx-fonts package most of the math fonts in ttf. But I don't think it makes sense to link some while not linking others. On another note, should I try to create a font subpackage and to install them properly, similarly to what the lyx package does? > - Please add the license breakdown above the License: field Should this be done for individual fonts? Or can `res/` be generalized under multiple Licenses by saying "Fonts are under the OFL, Knuth and DoubleStroke licenses"? I am trying to track down each files' licenses. The `fonts/` folder seems to contain only OFL fonts, except for the `special.ttf` for which I have no idea from where it is. I have no idea about `cyrillic` and `greek` though... If it is necessary/recommended, I'll ask the maintainer to see if he can give me each file's origin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
