https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943526
--- Comment #7 from Otto Urpelainen <[email protected]> --- %license must be always used, it puts the license to standard license file location in Fedora, which is /usr/share/licenses. Reference: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ The complain from unstalled but unpackaged files appears, because upstream build script installs the LICENSE to buildroot (to docs it seems), then rpm detects that there is a file installed in buildroot that is not handled in %files. There are at least two ways to fix this: Copy the license to docs as you were already doing. The it appears both in /usr/share/licenses and /usr/share/doc. That is kind of redundant, but not a big deal. Or get rid of the file with 'rm /unwanted/file' in the end of %install section, which avoids the duplication. The warning can also be silenced by using %exclude in %files, but apparently it will stop working in the future: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RWUGI5HAPH6FTM46QUC534ZE4HLMMOSG/ I will take a look at the new files later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
