https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870



--- Comment #11 from Eugene A. Pivnev <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #10)

Ok, let's go:

>   1. Upstream does not support building with an external copy of the
> dependency. If it did, you would NOT be permitted to bundle, no matter how
> inconvenient the extra packaging might be.

This was not discussed because Fedora/EPEL repos have no appropriate packages
and I have no plan to package them (see my note №1)

>   2. You have publicly contacted upstream about a path to supporting system
> libraries; and if upstream refused, recorded it in a comment or in a source
> file referenced from a comment adjacent to the virtual Provides.

There are no such system libs, see above.

>   3. You have added the appropriate virtual Provides to your spec file.
> These are just metadata, which allow bundling to be tracked.

qvge *not* installs any library but statically compiled with them in-place.
Just one binary and nothing else.
So I cannot provide anything but qvge itself.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to